What started out as a BPM detection tool for DJs, runners and dancers, has become one of the finest iTunes™ library management tools around.beaTunes' powerful inspection feature lets you clean up your iTunes track data in a way unrivaled by any other software on the market today. Music Studio offers a complete music production environment for the iPad/iPhone/iPod touch with features and a sound quality previously only known to desktop applications and expensive audio hardware.It combines a piano keyboard, 65 studio-quality instruments with sustain, a fully fledged 127-track sequencer, extensive note editing, reverb, real-time effects and much. Waf Music Managerįeatures:- Designed to manage large music collections.- Powerful search function.- Start right away – no need to index your music collections first.- Edit the metadata of multiple music files at once.- Supports the music formats: MP3, WMA, M4A (AAC), WAV and MP4 (audio only).- Supports the playlist formats: M3U and. Our interactive chord chart application is the quickest and most intuitive way to display and manage your digital chord charts. Communication and feedback is a two-way street, guys.Welcome to liveChord! A Windows based application for both studio and live performance. It would have been very helpful to know of resources such as the new video tutorial and forum topic via email. Those of us who’ve seen the potential of, and are willing to help test and refine your product should not have been left without guidance until now. Glad to see that an official topic has been created after many weeks of seeing basically nothing mentioned in your own forums. Searching constantly online for some sort of centralized repository detailing issues as they’ve come up, or how/when they are being resolved had been fruitless, not to mention frustrating. But, I found out about it only by initiating a Google search for The 4:30 official video is the first tutorial released with any meat to Glitches, questions, and suggestions submitted via the built-in Feedback pane were responded to at first, but not lately. Software worked pretty well out of the box. I’ve been testing Flow since the beta was released in October. Like playing the piano with quantize on or a drummer that keeps time perfectly to the microsecond it has no ‘swing’ and loses the human risk factor (in the precision timing) that is part of why a live DJ or live music is so compelling for me. It’s very clever, and they’re doing things right, but (and it’s been said before) pushed to its logical conclusion we end up with a computerised DJ. So the engineer in me loves this, but not the DJ. A “grid of zones” anyone? With new track/zone suggestions flowing onto a scrolling screen, for example. Why take the risk when introducing the software - it would be less likely to be accepted if it were initially radically different. Actually I think it’s probably only in Flow initially so we are all in our comfort zone. I think it’s only a matter of time before the “deck A, deck B” paradigm is thrown out here, for the right reasons. The focus on zones instead of cue points, and putting automation and sync (and detailed metadata about the track) at the foundation. I think it’s an indication of where things are destined to be going. I was not able to check the demo out, but I like this a lot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |